Wednesday, May 22nd 2013
FAQs |
| Contact |
| Sitemap
||Search_Form
**
We have 1139 guests and 1 member online
Home
About
MAG
Dynamic Coalitions
IGF Initiatives
Contributions
Funding
Press
2013 IGF: Bali
Preparatory Process
2013 Calendar
Submit a Proposal
View Proposals
Dynamic Coalitions
Resource Persons
Open Forum
Meetings
2012 IGF: Baku
2011 IGF: Nairobi
2010 IGF: Vilnius
2009 IGF: Sharm El Sheikh
2008 IGF: Hyderabad
2007 IGF: Rio de Janeiro
2006 IGF: Athens
Webcast
Tools for Interaction
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Flickr
Quick Links
IGF Discussion Space
Archived Discussion Space
Related Links
Warning
: include_once(WSReport_include.php) [
function.include-once
]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in
/home/wgig/public_html/igf/cms/components/com_chronocontact/chronocontact.html.php(319) : eval()'d code
on line
11
Warning
: include_once() [
function.include
]: Failed opening 'WSReport_include.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in
/home/wgig/public_html/igf/cms/components/com_chronocontact/chronocontact.html.php(319) : eval()'d code
on line
11
List of Proposed Workshops
<<
Start
<
Prev
63/123
Next
>
End
>>
Workshop Proposals 2011
Workshop Number:
124
Jump to report
Title:
Blocking content: issues, principles and paths forward
Background paper:
link
Status:
ACCEPTED
Concise Description:
Policymakers around the globe are trying to identify appropriate national policy solutions to combat illegal online activities such as child pornography, violation of intellectual property rights and other cybercriminal activities. Some of these solutions propose leveraging global DNS to block or filter illegal content by mandating that DNS registries, registrars, or ISPs alter DNS behavior or modify DNS data.
How effective are these types of approaches in the short and long terms? What implications do they have for the global DNS, for the implementation of DNSSEC, and the overall functioning and evolution of the Internet? Are these the right solutions to the problem or are there other approaches that policy makers should be considering?
Which of the five broad IGF Themes or the Cross-Cutting Priorities does your workshop fall under?
Security, Openness and Privacy
Have you organized an IGF workshop before?
Yes
If so, please provide the link to the report:
http://www.isoc.org/pubpolpillar/docs/20101007_igf-workshop.pdf
Provide the names and affiliations of the panellists you are planning to invite:
Moderator: Theresa Swinehart
Remote Moderator: Sorina Teleanu
Panelsists:
• Ben Akoh, Project Manager, IISD [Civil Society]
• Patrik Fältström, Distinguished Engineer, Office of the CTO, Cisco, and Adviser to the Swedish Government [security and stability expert]
• Kurt Erik Lindqvist, CEO of Netnod [DNS root server (I-root) operator, IX]
• Andrei Robachevsky, Technology Program Manager, Internet Society [Technical community]
• Andrey Kolesnikov, CEO, the Coordination Center for .RU and .РФ [DNS ccTLD Registry]
• Shane Tews, Vice President of Global Public Policy and Government Relation, Verisign [DNS gTLD Registry]
• Jason Weil, Time Warner Cable [Broadband ISP, Business]
• Paul Brigner, Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Policy Officer, MPAA [Business, content IPR]
• Shaundra Watson, Counsel for International Consumer Protection, FTC, US [Government]
• Cynthia M. Wong, Director, Global Internet Freedom Project, Center for Democracy & Technology [Civil Society]
• Bjørn-Erik Ludvigsen, Criminal Intelligence Officer, Interpol [Law enforcement agency]
Biographies:
Akoh Ben (Mr.)
Brigner Paul (Mr.)
Fältström Patrik (Mr.)
Kolesnikov Andrei (Mr.)
Lindqvist Kurt Erik (Mr.)
Ludvigsen Bjørn-Erik (Mr.)
McPherson Danny (Mr.)
Robachevsky Andrei (Mr.)
Swinehart Theresa (Ms.)
Watson Shaundra (Ms.)
Weil Jason (Mr.)
Wong Cynthia (Ms.)
Provide the name of the organizer(s) of the workshop and their affiliation to various stakeholder groups:
• Andrei Robachevsky, Technology Program Manager, ISOC [Internet Technical Community]
• Valeria Betancourt, Manager, Communication and Information Policy Programme, APC [Civil Society]
Organization:
ISOC, www.isoc.org
Contact Person:
Andrei Robachevsky
^Top
Report:
Reported by:
Andrei Robachevsky
Additional Documents:
link
A brief substantive summary and the main events that were raised:
The participants of the workshop discussed different approaches, technical and non-technical, to addressing these issues, their effectiveness in the short and long terms. They explored implications they have for fundamental Internet technologies and protocols, such as DNS and DNSSEC, and the overall functioning and evolution of the Internet. Finally, they offered their views possible future steps and venues for developing solutions, national or international. The workshop was very well attended and there was very high level of engagement with the audience.
Conclusions and further comments:
Different views on the nature of the problem, approaches and solutions were discussed, with the following takeaways:
- for effective solutions all involved parties should be part of the development of the solution, without unnecessary duplication of efforts;
- the focus should be on the real problem, not symptoms
- cooperation within the Internet community works well and is effective; as far as private-public international cooperation is concerned, while there are good examples, it should be enhanced and made more effective
- severity of the illegal content may warrant different approaches
- extreme cases (e.g. child sexual abuse material) shouldn't be the basis for policy development
- in the developing world, blocking may result in "blanket" blocking, outcasting the whole communities, or countries
Most of the controversy happened in the area of DNS blocking
Joomla Professional Work
Latest News
NKURUNZIZA Jean Paul (Mr), Consultant, Burundi
Souter David (Mr), ICT Development Associates, UK
Bollow Norbert (Mr), Self-employed consultant - Systems analyst and technologist – FOSS (Free and Open Source Software), Switzerland
Popular
Athens Preparatory Contributions
IGF 2012 - Frequently Asked Questions
Invitation to the Fifth Meeting of the Internet Governance Forum
Main Sessions 2012