Questionnaire “on the desirability of the continuation of the Forum”

As an input into the review process, all stakeholders are invited to submit comments with the online questionnaire below (there is no word limit, but please note that the session will time out after two hours). Other comments are also welcome.

A synthesis paper, conceived as a rolling document, will reflect all comments received. A first document was made available for the 13 May open consultations and the final version will be submitted to the IGF meeting in Sharm El Sheikh.

Questions:

1. To what extent has the IGF addressed the mandate set out for it in the Tunis Agenda?

1. To what extent has the IGF addressed the mandate set out for it in the Tunis Agenda? :: 1. To what extent has the IGF addressed the mandate set out for it in the Tunis Agenda?

2. To what extent has the IGF embodied the WSIS principles?

2. To what extent has the IGF embodied the WSIS principles? :: 2. To what extent has the IGF embodied the WSIS principles?

3. What has the impact of the IGF been in direct or indirect terms? Has it impacted you or your stakeholder group/institution/government? Has it acted as a catalyst for change?

3. What has the impact of the IGF been in direct or indirect terms? Has it impacted you or your stakeholder group/institution/government? Has it acted as a catalyst for change? :: 3. What has the impact of the IGF been in direct or indirect terms? Has it impacted you or your stakeholder group/institution/government? Has it acted as a catalyst for change?

4. How effective are IGF processes in addressing the tasks set out for it, including the functioning of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG), Secretariat and open consultations?

4. How effective are IGF processes in addressing the tasks set out for it, including the functioning of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG), Secretariat and open consultations? :: 4. How effective are IGF processes in addressing the tasks set out for it, including the functioning of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG), Secretariat and open consultations?

5. Is it desirable to continue the IGF past its initial five-year mandate, and why/why not?

5. Is it desirable to continue the IGF past its initial five-year mandate, and why/why not? :: 5. Is it desirable to continue the IGF past its initial five-year mandate, and why/why not?

6. If the continuation of the Forum is recommended, what improvements would you suggest in terms of its working methods, functioning and processes?

6. If the continuation of the Forum is recommended, what improvements would you suggest in terms of its working methods, functioning and processes? :: 6. If the continuation of the Forum is recommended, what improvements would you suggest in terms of its working methods, functioning and processes?

7. Do you have any other comments?

7. Do you have any other comments? :: 7. Do you have any other comments?

Name:

Name: :: Name

E-mail Address:

E-mail Address: :: E-mail Address

Affiliation:

Affiliation :: Please indicate the institution you work for.

Type the Characters in bold from the picture:

Type the Characters in bold from the picture. :: Spam Check: Type the Characters in bold from the picture.

Joomla Professional Work

2010 IGF: Vilnius

Meetings

Tools for Interaction

Quick Links

Questionnaire “on the desirability of the continuation of the Forum”

Latest News

Popular