IGF 2019 WS #41 Tech Nationalism: 5G, Cybersecurity and Trade

Organizer 1: Civil Society, Asia-Pacific Group
Organizer 2: Civil Society, Western European and Others Group (WEOG)
Organizer 3: Private Sector, Western European and Others Group (WEOG)
Organizer 4: Civil Society, Western European and Others Group (WEOG)

Speaker 1: Farzaneh Badii, Civil Society, Asia-Pacific Group
Speaker 2: William Hudson, Private Sector, Western European and Others Group (WEOG)
Speaker 3: jinhe liu, Civil Society, Asia-Pacific Group
Speaker 4: Jyoti Panday , Civil Society, Asia-Pacific Group
Speaker 5: Jan-Peter Kleinhans, Private Sector, Western European and Others Group (WEOG)

Policy Question(s): 

1. What is tech nationalism and how widespread is it in the developed and developing world?
2. What cybersecurity threats, if any, are posed by the national origin of 5G infrastructure suppliers?
3. Many observers have detected a subcategory of tech nationalism called "data nationalism" that views data as a 'national resource' to be 'protected' by the state. What are the arguments for and against this approach?
4. How much of the concern about foreign equipment, software and data use is motivated by economic protectionism and/or national industrial policy rather than cybersecurity?
5. How is it possible to reconcile national cybersecurity with globalized markets for software, services and equipment in the digital economy?
6. Is tech nationalism compatible with multistakeholder governance of the Internet?

Relevance to Theme: The past years have been a turbulent for trade and the digital economy. While protectionist agendas are affecting trade generally, the problem is compounded when national cyber security concerns are linked to trade in digital products and services. This has led to the rise of a phenomenon known as “tech nationalism.” Tech nationalism is a turn away from the globalized supply chains and trading system put in place in the 1990s, and a move toward suspicion and the "othering" of globalized supply chains and foreign producers of software, equipment and services. One of the key drivers of tech nationalism is the ongoing cyber conflict between China and the United States over leadership in 5G technologies. That conflict is militarizing the transition to 5G, cloud and other next-generation Internet technologies.

The question of supply chain security affects a number of Internet-related industries and tends to encourage what some observers have called “alignment” of Internet products and services with national jurisdictions. Some governments have used national security concerns to ban foreign antivirus products and block market access for foreign telecommunication equipment. Some have used cybersecurity rationales for laws that severely restrict outgoing information flows and market access for foreign cloud providers.

Relevance to Internet Governance: National protectionism based on cybersecurity concerns has direct and indirect effects on Internet governance. The Internet helped to globalize the digital economy. A refusal to trust or accept products and services from foreign producers divides the Internet into national walls and limits global connectivity. It also affects the growth of the digital economy. A digital protectionist agenda is not compatible with the argument that the Internet should be governed through a global, multistakeholder mechanism and that it should remain open and interoperable. Moreover, free trade agreements around digital transactions might facilitate the governance of the Internet and its interconnectedness by preventing data localization.


Debate - Auditorium - 90 Min

Description: The session will discuss the securitization of software and telecom equipment, in the context of the industrial policy competition over 5G, artificial intelligence and other “strategic” technologies that are alleged to be critical to national power. The workshop is presented as a “debate” in that there are two distinct sides to tech nationalism (basically pro and con), but the speakers are not polarized on this and will be able to appreciate the claims of either position. The debate will explore how such securitization affects Internet governance and the digital economy. The panel will include perspectives from the USA, Europe, India, Iran and China, and stakeholders from civil society, private sector and government. It will focus in particular on the battle over 5G infrastructure development but include other arenas such as data nationalism.

Expected Outcomes: The workshop expects to illuminate and clarify the actual nature and scope of the threats provided by 5G infrastructure development.
The workshop is expected to develop a consensus on the best practices needed to reconcile the advantages of globalization and trade with cybersecurity and the mistrust that exists among national governments.
The outcome of the workshop will be summarized and published on the blogs of the organizers, and serve as the building block of additional meetings in the private sector, civil society, and governmental comment periods.

Discussion Facilitation: 

The moderator will pose questions and issues to pairs of speakers with contrasting views. They will engage with each other, debating the differences and trying to reach agreement. There will be three rounds of this. Then there will be an opening to the audience to discuss one side or the other. In the final segment the discussion will be steered toward resolution and agreement on best practices.

Online Participation: 

Monitor the WebEX chat room and read out the comments
Before the meeting, publicize the link to the room and inform the public that they can attend remotely
Remind various stakeholders and networks that RP is possible and encourage
Work closely with the moderator in person to integrate remote participants in the process

Proposed Additional Tools: Twitter.


GOAL 1: No Poverty
GOAL 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth
GOAL 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
GOAL 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions