Community Networks: the Internet by the People for the People (DC on Community Connectivity)

Community Networks: the Internet by the People for the People (DC on Community Connectivity) emazzucchi Fri, 20/10/2017 - 13:00

Preview prepared by Luca Belli

This is the preview of the book “Community Networks: the Internet by the People for the People,”

which is the Official 2017 Outcome of the UN IGF Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity

(DC3). DC3 is a multistakeholder group aimed at fostering a cooperative analysis of the community

network model, exploring how such networks may be used to foster sustainable Internet connectivity

while empowering Internet users. DC3 provides a shared platform involving all interested individuals

and institutions into a multistakeholder analysis of community connectivity issues. This book should

be seen as a further step towards a better understanding of community networking and is built upon

the previous efforts of the DC3.

View and Add Comments for Paragraph

This volume is structured in two sections (i) exploring challenges and opportunities for community

networks in four different continents (CNs) and (ii) analysing a series of case studies and forwardlooking

proposals regarding CNs. As a conclusion, this work includes the updated version of the

Declaration on Community Connectivity, which was elaborated through a multistakeholder

participatory process, featuring an online open consultation, between July and November 2016; a

public debate and a feedback-collection process, during the IGF 2016; and a further online

consultation, between December 2016 and March 2017.

View and Add Comments for Paragraph

As stated by the Declaration on Community Connectivity, CNs are crowdsourced networks

“structured to be open, free, and to respect network neutrality. Such networks rely on the active

participation of local communities in the design, development, deployment, and management of

shared infrastructure as a common resource, owned by the community, and operated in a

democratic fashion. Community networks can be operationalised, wholly or partly, through

individuals and local stakeholders, NGO's, private sector entities, and/or public administrations.”

View and Add Comments for Paragraph

For this reason, it can be argued that CNs promote an individual-centred Internet, for the people, by

the people. Building on the previous works of the DC3, this book aims at fostering a better

understanding of what are CNs and the opportunities that these initiatives offer to develop of a

sustainable Internet environment, fostering a sustainable connectivity agenda and allowing the greatest

possible number of individuals to enjoy the benefits of information and telecommunications


View and Add Comments for Paragraph

1.1. Challenges and Opportunities for Community Networks

The first part of this volume explores a variety of regulatory, technical, social and economic challenges

raised by community-networking initiatives. The five chapters included in this part do not simply

analyse the challenges faced by CNs but put forward potential solutions, suggestions and

recommendations that are based on critical observation and evidence-based analysis and should be

considered by all stakeholders.

View and Add Comments for Paragraph

In the opening chapter on “Network Self-determination and the Positive Externalities of

Community Networks,”
Luca Belli argues that existing examples of CNs provide a solid evidencebase

on which a right to network self-determination can be constructed. Network self-determination

should be seen as the right to freely associate in order to define, in a democratic fashion, the design,

development and management of network infrastructure as a common good, so that all individuals can

freely seek, impart and receive information and innovation. First, this chapter argues that the right to

network self-determination finds its basis in the fundamental right to self-determination of people as

well as in the right to informational self-determination that, since the 1980s, has been consecrated as

an expression of the right to free development of the personality. In this sense, the author emphasises

that, network self-determination plays a pivotal role allowing individuals to associate and join efforts

to bridge digital divides in a bottom-up fashion, freely developing common infrastructure.

Subsequently, Belli examines a selection of CNs, highlighting the positive externalities triggered by

such initiatives, with regard to the establishment of new governance structures as well as the

development of new content, applications and services that cater for the needs of the local

communities, empowering previously unconnected individuals. The chapter offers evidence that the

development of CNs can prompt several positive external-effects that considerably enhance the

standards of living of individuals, creating learning opportunities, stimulating local entrepreneurship,

fostering the creation of entirely new jobs, reviving social bounds amongst community members and

fostering multistakeholder partnerships. For these reasons, policymakers should design national and

international policy frameworks that recognise the importance of network self-determination and

facilitate the establishment of CNs rather than hindering their development.

View and Add Comments for Paragraph

In his chapter on “Barriers for development and scale of Community Networks in Africa,” Carlos

Rey-Moreno explains that that CNs should be seen as communications infrastructure deployed and

operated by citizens to meet their own communication needs and such initiatives are being increasingly

proposed as a solution to foster connectivity. However, Rey-Moreno emphasises that, in Africa, where

the proportion of unconnected individuals is among the highest globally, the number of initiatives

identified is relatively low considering the continent’s size and population. Hence, the chapter focuses

on the barriers that prevent more CNs from appearing or existing ones from becoming sustainable

and scaling. The barriers identified range from the lack of awareness of both the potential benefits of

accessing information, and the Internet more generally, and the possibility for communities to create

their own network, to the lack of income of the people who would like to start one. Importantly, the

author notes that most of the people within the next billion to be connected need to choose, daily,

between Internet/communication networks and other vital necessities such a food and health.

The unreliable (or the complete lack of) electricity in most of these areas, and the high cost of backhaul

connectivity, also affects the capital required to start and operate CNs. The lack of local technical

competencies, and a regulatory framework not conducive for the establishment of small, local

communication providers, are also identified as the main barriers for growth of community networks

in the region. Despite this breadth of barriers, African communities are proving that some, if not all,

of these barriers have been addressed. As stressed by Rey-Moreno, this is motivating global

organisations to contribute creating an enabling environment that removes these barriers.

View and Add Comments for Paragraph

In his chapter on “Community Networks as a Key Enabler of Sustainable Access,” Michael J.

Oghia defines sustainable access to the Internet, as the ability for any user to connect to the Internet

and then stay connected over time, thus contributing critically to sustainable development. The author

argues that CNs are ideal to catalyse sustainable access, but the challenge of generating reliable energy

to power infrastructure continues to pose a significant barrier to lowering costs and the ability to scale.

This chapter aims to highlight the link between community networks and the broader agenda on

sustainability, defines sustainable access, and explores the connection between infrastructure, energy,

and Internet access, while concluding by outlining the role of CNs as a pillar of enabling sustainable


View and Add Comments for Paragraph

In her chapter on “Community Networks: Policy & regulatory issues and gaps, an experience

from India,”
Ritu Srivastava discusses the Digital Empowerment Foundation’s Wireless for

Communities model, exploring the legal and regulatory challenges frequently faced by CNs in

developing countries, with particular regard to spectrum allocation and management, licensing

regulation, and bandwidth policies in India. The author maps out the common elements of these

challenges among CNs and, subsequently, addresses policy and regulatory issues. Notably this chapter

investigates the efficacy of creating Wireless Community Networks, Rural Internet Service Providers

or community-based Internet Service Providers and explores the possibility of policies, which could

help in creating widespread information infrastructure for developing countries, with a focus on India,

in order to better connect the subcontinent. Importantly, Srivastava’s paper puts forward a number of

recommendations for policy-makers, regulatory bodies, and related stakeholders. Such

recommendations are organised into national recommendations and regional and international

recommendations. The national recommendations include suggestions regarding how to alleviate

unnecessary regulatory and fiscal hurdles on small/rural Internet Service Providers and CNs in India.

The regional and international recommendations focus on creating a more enabling policy and

regulatory environment for CNs, in general, and can be applied to any national context.

View and Add Comments for Paragraph

In their paper on “Can the Unconnected Connect Themselves? Towards an Action Research

Agenda for Local Access Networks,”
Carlos Rey-Moreno, Anriette Esterhuysen, Mike Jensen, Peter

Bloom, Erick Huerta and Steve Song argue that community-based solutions to building local network

infrastructure are increasingly being considered as viable alternatives to traditional large-scale national

deployment models. Use of low-cost networking equipment to provide communication infrastructure

built in a bottom-up manner is growing, especially in rural areas where connectivity is poor. While

there are instances of these solutions that stand as real-world examples of ways to improve access to

ICTs and provide affordable and equitable access, these models of Internet access provision are still

not widely known or well accepted, usually being deemed as ‘fringe’ solutions to connectivity needs

that lack widespread applicability or the potential to scale. This chapter outlines a proposed action

research agenda
and methodology for providing an evidence-based understanding of the potential

role of these types of local infrastructure solutions in meeting the needs of the unconnected, as well as

those on costly-metered broadband services.

View and Add Comments for Paragraph

1.2 Building Connectivity in a Bottom-up Fashion

The second part of this work analyses a selection of CNs, stressing the diversity of the social, economic

and technical backgrounds from which CNs may originate as well as highlighting that very

heterogeneous models that may be utilised to establish and maintain CNs. The cases presented in this

section witness the variety of CNs, demonstrate that these initiatives may be developed in many

different environments and suggest the interest of promoting further research on the matter.

View and Add Comments for Paragraph

Erik Huerta Velazquez and Karla Velasco’s chapter on “The Success of Community Mobile

Telephony in Mexico and its Plausibility as an Alternative to Connect the Next Billion”
opens the

second part of this book. The authors introduce a framework for the design and instrumentation of

Community Mobile Telephony (CMT) from a Mexican perspective but applicable to other regions.

Particularly, this chapter describes the case of Telecomunicaciones Indigenas Comunitarias A.C. and

Rhizomatica whose CMT began operating in 2013 in Talea de Castro, Oaxaca, under a private

network scheme and using a segment of spectrum, acquired for free-and-non-profit use. The case

analysed in this chapter demonstrates that, under a new technical, economic and organizational

scheme, it was possible to offer, in a sustainable manner, mobile services in commercially unfeasible

localities. After 3 years, since inception, the system covered eighteen localities of between two hundred

and three thousand habitants. As Huerta and Velasco emphasise, these data confirm not only the

viability of the model but also the possibility to expand it to communities without mobile service.

Moreover, this experience paved the way for the creation of a new framework among traditional

operators, which allowed them to connect rural locations, previously deemed inviable. Importantly,

the success of the project has given way to a new legal framework and a modification in spectrum

administration, which, for the first time in Mexican history, assigned a portion of GSM spectrum for

social purposes. The success of the Mexican case proves that Community Mobile Telephony is a

plausible option that should be embraced to connect over 2 billion people without affordable mobile

coverage and the 700 million with no coverage at all, by supporting communities to build and maintain

self-governed and owned communication infrastructure.

View and Add Comments for Paragraph

In their chapter on “Community-led Networks for Sustainable Rural Broadband in India: the

Case of Gram Marg,”
Sarbani Banerjee Belur, Meghna Khaturia and Nanditha P. Rao argue that, to

bridge the digital divide facing rural India, a cost-effective technology solution and a sustainable

economic model based on community-led networks is needed. Gram Marg Rural Broadband project

at IIT Bombay, India has been working on both these aspects through field trials and test-bed

deployments. The authors critically argue that, even if the connectivity reaches rural India, the network

infrastructure would not be able to sustain itself at the village level, without a sustainable economic

This chapter analyses the findings of the impact studies performed by the authors, which have

exposed the need for community owned networks. Conspicuously, the study reveals that villagers have

a clear understanding that they can save time and money, when Internet connectivity reaches the

village. However, the adoption of traditional Internet access provision paradigm was not sustainable.

On the contrary, villagers suggested community-led networks would enable them to “own Internet”

and, to this end, the Public-Private-Panchayat Partnership (4-P) model was developed. In this

context, the Panchayat, which is the local self-government – which operates at the village level

according to the Indian decentralised administration system – takes ownership of the network.

View and Add Comments for Paragraph

The partnership enables the network to be community-led for effective decision making and

prioritising services based on the needs of the villagers. The public-private partnership enables Internet

connectivity to reach the village from where the management is taken over by the Panchayat that

supports the investment for the local network infrastructure, at the village level. Local youth known as

Village Level Entrepreneurs (VLEs) invest, maintain the network and generate revenue. The authors

stress that the model ensures a decent and sustainable return on investment for the Panchayat and

defines a nominal user subscription cost. It also considers expected future growth in demand and

related cost dynamics. This chapter offers a crucial perspective on the relevance of revenue generation

and sharing, stressing that CNs can be economically sustainable, providing incentive for connectivity

expansion and empowerment of local villagers.

View and Add Comments for Paragraph

In his chapter on “Comparing Two Community Network Experiences in Brazil,” Bruno Vianna

describes two installations of community networks in two different environments in the state of Rio

de Janeiro, Brazil. The first case study, completed in 2015, was established in the rural village of

Fumaça. The development of this CN was made possible thanks to a grant from Commotion Wireless

and was built by a team of volunteers together with the members of the local community. To date, the

network remains operational, providing free and open access to the Fumaça community. The second

one was established in the Maré Complex, an area concentrating a considerable number of favelas in

the city of Rio de Janeiro. It was made possible through an open call for workshops from the Rio de

Janeiro state government, and was implemented by the students who participated in the weeklong

course and were, for the main part, coming from the local favelas. The two cases provide interesting

information regarding the potential for CNs in the global south, highlighting the possibility that such

initiative can have with regard to capacity-building, empowerment and the creation of new

opportunities for youngsters.

View and Add Comments for Paragraph

In her chapter on “Beyond the Invisible Hand: the Need to Foster an Ecosystem Allowing for

Community Networks in Brazil,”
Nathalia Foditsch provides a useful complement to the discussion

started in the previous chapter by Bruno Vianna, arguing that the debate over CNs is not new in Brazil

but needs to gain momentum again, in order to overcome some obstacles. Notably, the author

emphasises that promoting a favourable ecosystem is a challenge that goes beyond the technical

aspects of deploying and managing such networks. Recent advancements show signs of an increasingly

encouraging environment for CNs, but a lot remains to be done. This chapter briefly discusses some

challenges and new regulatory developments in Brazil and explores how the work of the IGF

Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity might contribute to the promotion of an ecosystem

that facilitates the establishment of CNs.

View and Add Comments for Paragraph

It should be like that…

It should be like that. People must know the importance of internet now a days, not just for work, but for information dissemination. - Yang 

more info

0 People voted for this

In her chapter on “Diseño e Implementación de una Aplicación Web para la Visualización Mundial de

Despliegues de Redes Comunitarias”
(Design and Implementation of a Web Application for the

Global Visualization of Community Network Deployments)
, Maureen Hernandez stresses that it is

currently hard to obtain systematised information regarding the existing CN deployments around the

world. Nothing the lack of a database or repository providing basic information about CNs, such as

the name, localization, and contact person of these initiatives, the author proposes to remedy to this

lacuna though the development of technical tool. This chapter proposes to collect data on CNs to

organise them to facilitate interactions among stakeholders and take advantage of the lessons learned,

instead of letting each community starting from zero. Hernandez argues that such effort may be feasible

based on the outcomes that have been developed, to date, by initiatives like the UN IGF Dynamic

Coalition for Community Connectivity or the research group Global Access to the Internet for All

(GAIA), from the Internet Research Task Force (ITRF). The paper argues that the ability to visualise

information about CNs into a unique tool may be a crucial factor not only to promote and inspire more

deployments but also to understand how far these initiatives have come and how different their

characteristics may be. In this perspective, Hernandez proposes a “Community Connectivity Map”

with the aim to systematise and visualise data about the largest possible number of CNs.

View and Add Comments for Paragraph