Short Title:
Proposer's Name: Mr. Ayden Férdeline
Proposer's Organization: ICANN Non-Commercial Users Constituency
Co-Proposer's Name: Ms. Farzaneh Badii
Co-Proposer's Organization: Internet Governance Project
Co-Organizers:
Dr.,Farzaneh,BADII,Civil Society,Internet Governance Project
Agenda:
1. Moderator will set the scene introduce the panel
2. Issue 1: content regulation and trademark overreach in IG institutions
3. Issue 2: policies that can lead to trademark overreach and hamper free expressions
4. Issue 3: Stop DNS abuse but don't hamper free expression
5. Issue 5: Multistakeholder community response to content regulation in IG institutions
Session Format: Round Table - 90 Min
Proposer:
Country: United Kingdom
Stakeholder Group: Civil Society
Co-Proposer:
Country: United States
Stakeholder Group: Civil Society
Speaker: Milton Mueller
Speaker: Tatiana Tropina
Speaker: Bishakha Datta
Content of the Session:
Private ordering is common in the field of Internet governance, cybersecurity, and cybercrime. Private ordering refers to governance by means of contracts, markets, or voluntary cooperative networks of non-state actors. The Internet relies heavily on private ordering because it is difficult for territorial governments to regulate effectively by traditional methods of intervention.
Private ordering is used in Internet governance institutions such as the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). ICANN implements policies through contractual agreements and develops policies via a multistakeholder process rooted in non-state actors. Nevertheless, ICANN’s control of the root of the Domain Name System (DNS) creates a centralized “choke point” where control over website content and Internet expression can be exerted by regulating domain name registries and registrars (e.g., by taking down domains or withdrawing licenses to register names). Most stakeholders believe that ICANN’s authority to coordinate and make policy for the DNS should not be leveraged to make ICANN a content regulator on the Internet.
As part of ICANN’s reform process, a new mission statement was adopted which expressly forbids ICANN from engaging in content regulation. Some interest groups, however, often put pressure on ICANN to use its power over domains to become an internet regulator. Most notably, this pressure comes from copyright and trademark interests, law enforcement agencies, and some governments.
Relevance of the Session:
This workshop will address the following issues:
* How do ICANN’s policies affect free expression on the Internet?
* When is ICANN a “private actor” able to exert control through private contracts, and when is it more like a public regulator that should be subject to free expression protections?
* What are the dangers for Internet governance institutions, platforms, and the broader Internet governance ecosystem if they step into content regulation?
* What are the differences between policies and frameworks for addressing DNS abuse related to technical threats and content regulation?
* What solutions can the multistakeholder community put forward to prevent Internet governance organizations from extending their technical coordination powers into content regulation?
Tag 1: Domain Name System
Tag 2: Content
Tag 3:
Interventions:
The roundtable discussion will bring together different stakeholders participating in ICANN policy-making processes to discuss the issues and the relevance for the wider Internet governance community.
Diversity:
The roundtable format will allow addressing the issues from different perspectives: there will be a gender balance of participants, speakers from all UN-recognised geographic regions, youth participation, and speakers from a wide array of stakeholder groups.
Onsite Moderator: Farzaneh Badii
Online Moderator: Renata Aquino Ribeiro
Rapporteur: Ines Hfaiedh
Online Participation:
A remote moderator will enlist questions and comments from the audience during the workshop. Prior to the workshop, the hashtags #NCUC
#InternetPolicy will be used to bring in comments and questions from prospective attendees which may enrich the debate. A collaborative document
will gather these records of comments and questions prior to, during, and after the workshop, and will be integrated into the report. A variety of
media can also serve as background material for this debate, based on previous workshops done at IGF. Remote participation tools will ensure an
inclusive, accessible, and global audience.
Discussion facilitation:
We will have a virtual hub set-up via Skype to engage the NCUC's globally-dispersed membership in this workshop, we will use Twitter extensively, and we will give equal priority to both in-person and remote participants when making interventions.
Conducted a Workshop in IGF before?: Yes
Link to Report: http://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/index.php?q=filedepot_download/4098/297