|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Breakout groups (30 minutes)
Reports from breakout groups (30 minutes)
|
|
|
|
|
Breakout groups in workshop evaluation groups to discuss the combined scores for the respectve areas |
|
|
|
|
Break |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finalising decision on number of workshops based on: |
Update on other forms of session proposals. Agreed number of workshops to be included and allocation by issue area. |
|
|
|
|
Final selection of recommended sessions from each group. | |
|
|
|
||
|
|
Initial ideas about programme structure: |
Final list of workshops endorsed by the MAG. | |
Preparatory phase – implementation plan and Q&A - Issue teams terms of reference -revisit and confirm - How to form issue teams and when to open to others in the community? - Issue area wiki’s - Concept of introductory sessions and next steps |
Review of the design, introductory sessions, and engagement of BPFs, PNs, DCs and role of MAG members. Review draft issue teams TOR |
||
|
|
Break |
||
|
|
|||
